> U.S. Federal Trade Commission Brings $450 Million Internet Fraud Case Against Alberta Online Operator | COMPETITION LAW

Categories

Archives


The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has announced that it has filed a $450 million internet fraud civil suit against an Alberta online operator.

According to the FTC, Jesse Willms, an online operator with ten marketing companies, has:

“… raked in more than $450 million from consumers in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand by luring them into ‘free’ or ‘risk-free’ offers, and then charging them for products and services they did not want or agree to purchase. … The defendants used the lure of a ‘free’ offer to open an illegal pipeline to consumers’ credit card and bank accounts.”  See: FTC Charges Online Marketers with Scamming Consumers out of Hundreds of Millions of Dollars with “Free” Trial Offers.

The FTC’s complaint alleges, among other things, that Willms and the companies he controls:

– Used deceptive tactics in offering “free trials” for various online products, including acai berry weight-loss pills, teeth whiteners and health supplements.

– Obtained consumers’ credit or debit card account numbers, by enticing them with “bogus ‘free’ or ‘risk-free’ trial offers that supposedly required only small shipping and handling fees, and also promised phony ‘bonus’ offers just for signing up” (and were charged for trial and bonus products plus recurring monthly fees).

– Made false claims about the total cost of products, recurring charges and the availability of refunds.

– Made false weight loss and cancer cure claims in relation to products.

– Provided merchant banks with false or misleading information to acquire and maintain credit and debit card processing services from the banks in light of “mounting chargeback rates and consumer complaints.”

– Concealed important terms and conditions relating to product sales.

According to the FTC, it worked closely with Canadian law enforcement officials, including the federal Competition Bureau, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Alberta Partnership Against Cross Border Fraud and the Edmonton Better Business Bureau.

In Canada, the federal Competition Act contains both civil and criminal provisions dealing with false or misleading representations and also governs a variety of specific forms of marketing conduct including “ordinary selling price” claims, selling above an advertised price, deceptive telemarketing, promotional contests and performance claims.

Generally speaking, the civil misleading advertising provisions of the Act prohibit representations to the public, for the purpose of promoting a product or business interest, that are false or misleading in a material respect.  The criminal provisions, which are substantially similar, prohibit false or misleading representations that are made intentionally (i.e., knowingly or recklessly).

Some of the types of claims that have been of concern for Canadian courts and the Competition Bureau in the past include literally false claims, omitting key information relating to the price or terms of sale of products and false claims regarding the performance of products (product performance claims must be supported by “adequate and proper” tests before any claim is made).

As with the FTC claims, the Competition Bureau has also pursued companies for inaccurate use of the term “free” in connection with marketing claims (see: False or Misleading Representations and Deceptive Marketing Practices and Misleading Advertising Guidelines) and has also issued specific guidelines setting out its enforcement position for online marketing and advertising (see: Application of the Competition Act to Representations on the Internet).

As a result of amendments to the Act in 2009, it is also not necessary to show that a misleading claim was made to Canadian consumers or was made in a publicly accessible place.  These changes were recently made to address perceived gaps in the Act and to specifically address misleading claims made in Canada targeting foreign consumers (as is alleged in this FTC case, albeit from a U.S. enforcement perspective) and claims originating in places without direct consumer contact (e.g., in the context of online marketing operations).

For copies of the FTC’s complaint and motion for injunction see:

Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief

Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support

For Jessie Willms’ news release in reply to the FTC’s allegations see:

JessieWillms.com

_________________

For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact

For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney

Comments are closed.

    buy-contest-form Templates/precedents and checklists to run promotional contests in Canada

    buy-contest-form Templates/precedents and checklists to comply with Canadian anti-spam law (CASL)

    WELCOME TO CANADIAN COMPETITION LAW! - OUR COMPETITION BLOG

    We are a Toronto based competition, advertising and regulatory law firm.

    We offer business, association, government and other clients in Toronto, Canada and internationally efficient and strategic advice in relation to Canadian competition, advertising, regulatory and new media laws. We also offer compliance, education and policy services.

    Our experience includes more than 20 years advising companies, trade and professional associations, governments and other clients in relation to competition, advertising and marketing, promotional contest, cartel, abuse of dominance, competition compliance, refusal to deal and pricing and distribution law matters.

    Our representative work includes filing and defending against Competition Bureau complaints, legal opinions and advice, competition, CASL and advertising compliance programs and strategy in competition and regulatory law matters.

    We have also written and helped develop many competition and advertising law related industry resources including compliance programs, acting as subject matter experts for online and in-person industry compliance courses and Steve Szentesi as Lawyer Editor for Practical Law Canada Competition.

    For more about us, visit our website: here.