August 26, 2022
CASL (FEDERAL ANTI-SPAM LAW)
COMPLIANCE PRECEDENTS AND CHECKLISTS
Do you need CASL precedents or checklists
to comply with Canadian anti-spam law?
In addition to our legal services, we offer lawyer-prepared CASL compliance precedents and checklists that identify key consent, disclosure and other requirements to send commercial electronic messages (CEMs) to Canadians and provide checklists and templates to comply with CASL.
Our compliance precedents and checklists are an excellent way to mitigate risk and avoid common CASL-related issues, including relating to express consent requests, sender identification information for CEMs, CASL-compliant unsubscribe mechanisms, business related exemptions and types of implied consent and documenting consent and scrubbing distribution lists. We also offer a template CASL corporate compliance program based on the Canadian CRTC’s CASL compliance program recommendations.
All of our Canadian CASL compliance precedents and checklists include practical overviews of each of the relevant requirements, compliance checklists and guidance how to use them.
Our CASL compliance checklists and precedents are Word version documents with PayPal checkout and credit card payment options.
For more information and to order see: CASL Compliance Checklists and Precedents.
********************
Canada’s federal anti-spam legislation (CASL) came into force in 2014. Since then, marketers and their advisors have been working to comply with what remains a complex law with outstanding uncertainties in some key areas.
In providing CASL advice to clients since CASL came into force in 2014, and over the past several years, I regularly see some of the same compliance errors being repeatedly being made, including by otherwise sophisticated marketers.
It is also relatively uncommon for me to see companies have a CASL compliance program in place or established processes to comply with the consent, sender identification, unsubscribe and documenting consent requirements under CASL.
In this regard, one common CASL compliance error that I see is sharing contact lists with third parties without consent and without covering off the potential liability if the third party that receives a distriubiton list violates CASL.
In this regard, some electronic marketers want to share consents for electronic marketing with third parties. This may include related entities (i.e., affiliates) or unrelated third related marketers with which the party seeking consent has business relationships (e.g., affiliate marketing).
While obtaining and sharing consents with third parties is permitted under CASL, marketers need to be aware that there are specific rules that must be met for both gathering consents and sharing lists depending on who a list will be shared with (e.g., to expressly identify a third party with whom consent is being gathered on behalf, including the third parties contact information and other, unfortunately complex, requirements if the identity of a third party with whom a list will be shared is not known at the time consent is requested).
Marketers should also be aware that there is also potentially not only liability if they violate CASL as senders of unsolicited CEMs, but also if they assist a third party violate the legislation.
In this regard, CASL is broad enough for liability for not only the senders of unsolicited CEMs but also those that “aid, induce, procure or cause to be procured the doing of any act” that violates section 6 of CASL (section 9 of CASL).
Based on this “aiding and abetting” type provision, it is often prudent, even if CASL-compliant consents have been obtained for third parties, for marketers to ensure that they have agreements in place with third parties with whom they intend to share e-mails to minimize risk (i.e., list sharing agreements).
Such list sharing agreements may include, among other things, a covenant by the third party receiving the distribution list to comply with CASL and an indemnification provision in favour of the marketer sharing the list in the event the third party violates CASL.
Of course, the strength of any such list provider agreements and contractual terms will depend on the ability of a third party receiving a distribution list to fulfill the indemnify and other obligations set out in the list sharing agreement.
For more information about CASL, see: Canadian Anti-Spam Law (CASL), CASL Compliance, CASL Compliance Tips, CASL Compliance Errors and CASL FAQs.
********************
CASL (CANADIAN ANTI-SPAM LAW) COMPLIANCE TIPS
For tips to comply with Canada’s federal anti-spam legislation (CASL), see: CASL Compliance Tips.
********************
SERVICES AND CONTACT
We are a Toronto based competition and advertising law firm offering business and individual clients efficient and strategic advice in relation to competition/antitrust, advertising, Internet and new media law and contest law. We also offer competition and regulatory law compliance, education and policy services to companies, trade and professional associations and government agencies.
Our experience includes advising clients in Toronto, Canada and the United States on the application of Canadian competition and regulatory laws and we have worked on hundreds of domestic and cross-border competition, advertising and marketing, promotional contest (sweepstakes), conspiracy (cartel), abuse of dominance, compliance, refusal to deal and pricing and distribution matters. For more information about our competition and advertising law services see: competition law services.
To contact us about a potential legal matter, see: contact
For more information about our firm, visit our website: Competitionlawyer.ca
Templates/precedents and checklists to run promotional contests in Canada
Templates/precedents and checklists to comply with Canadian anti-spam law (CASL)
